Determining who is responsible for an accident is crucial in personal injury law. This is because it is the first step to assessing fault and deciding on compensation. Fault is not always black or white. Both the plaintiff and defendant may share responsibility in many cases. In these situations, the courts will apply a doctrine called comparative negligence.
Understanding how Florida’s comparative negligence works will have a significant impact on your compensation and claim.
Feel Free To Schedule A Consultation
Contact Bonardi & Uzdavinis without delay to arrange a FREE consultation.
What is comparative negligence?
Comparative negligence, as a legal concept, allows courts to assign responsibility for an injury or accident amongst multiple parties. If a person is found partially responsible for an incident and sues the court for damages, the compensation will be reduced in proportion to the amount of blame.Example:
Imagine that a plaintiff seeks $100,000 in damages for a car crash. If the court determines that the defendant is 70% at fault and the plaintiff 30%, then the plaintiff will only receive $70,000 or 70% of total damages. This system is fair because it holds each party responsible for their actions, while still allowing the injured to recover some of their losses. Different types of comparative negligence In the United States, there are two types of comparative fault systems: modified comparative neglect and pure comparative. In Florida, a third system that is more restrictive — contributory negligence — still exists in some states. Here’s a breakdown:-
Pure Comparative Negligence
- No matter how much you are at fault, you can still recover.
- Even in cases that are highly contentious, partial compensation may still be possible.
- Both plaintiffs and defendants are encouraged to take responsibility.
-
Modified Comparative Negligence
- The 50% bar rule states that plaintiffs are not entitled to recover damages when they are at least 50% responsible.
- 51% Bar Rules: If the plaintiff is more than 50% responsible, they cannot recover.
-
Contributory Negligence is not used in Florida
Modified Comparative Negligence in Florida
Modified Comparative negligence in Florida is applicable to a variety of personal injury claims, including:- Car accidents
- Slip and fall
- Premises liability
- Medical malpractice
- Product Liability
- Animal attacks and dog bites
Feel Free To Schedule A Consultation
Contact Bonardi & Uzdavinis without delay to arrange a FREE consultation.
Florida Statutes
Florida Statutes S. 768.81 codifies the laws of comparative negligence in Florida. This statute governs negligence cases involving multiple parties. This statute allows the courts to allocate damages according to each party’s degree of responsibility. The plaintiff may still be entitled to compensation, even if the defendant proves that the plaintiff is partially at fault. However, they will not receive the full amount.Impact on Insurance Claims
Negotiations with insurance companies are common in personal injury cases before the case reaches court. Insurance adjusters use comparative negligence principles to assess claims. If you fall and slip in a shop and the insurer determines that you were distracted by your phone, they may hold you partially responsible. Your settlement may be reduced by up to 20%, based on your percentage of fault. Understanding how Florida insurers use comparative negligence can help you to negotiate more effectively, or decide when the time is right to hire a personal injury lawyer.Examples of Comparative Negligence In Real Life
Example 1: Car Accident
Two cars collided at an intersection. Driver A was speeding while Driver B did not yield to a stop sign. The court finds that:- Driver A: 40% at fault (for speeding)
- Driver B: 60% of the fault (for failing to yield)
Example 2: Slip-and-Fall
A shopper slips in an grocery store on a wet surface. The surveillance footage shows that the shopper had been texting while not paying attention. The court finds that:- Grocery store: 70% of the fault (for failing to display a warning sign).
- Shopper: 30% to blame (for being distracted).
Comparative Negligence & Wrongful death
In wrongful death claims, comparative negligence may also be applicable. The court can reduce the award to the family if the deceased had a share of the fault in the incident that led to their death. If, for example, someone dies in a boating crash but it is found that they were driving the boat under the influence, the court may reduce the compensation awarded to the surviving family. Comparative Negligence: How to Prove or Defend Against it It doesn’t matter if you are the plaintiff or defendant. Proving the percentage of blame is the most important aspect of any case. Your legal team will collect evidence, such as:- Accident reports
- Surveillance footage
- Eyewitness accounts
- Expert testimony (e.g., accident reconstruction)
- Medical Records
Why This Doctrine is Important
Understanding Florida’s comparative fault rule is important for:- Realistic expectations of compensation
- As a plaintiff or defendant, you can strengthen your argument by strengthening the evidence that you have.
- Negotiating with Insurance Companies Effectively
- Reduce your liability exposure when you are partially responsible
What to do if you have been injured in Florida?
To navigate the complex legal issues of comparative negligence, you need to have a thorough understanding of Florida laws. If you are found to be 30% at fault, compared to 50% at fault, it can mean thousands in compensation or nothing at all. We help our clients in Tampa and throughout Florida understand their rights under the laws of comparative negligence. Our legal team will work to collect the evidence needed to reduce the amount of fault you are assigned and fight to get the maximum compensation. Being injured is a difficult experience. Our team will guide you with compassion and clarity through the legal system.Final Thoughts
Florida’s personal injury laws are based on the concept of comparative negligence. This concept balances fairness with accountability by acknowledging that many parties can be responsible for an accident. Don’t think you are not eligible for compensation if you have been injured, even if you feel you were partly at fault. Understanding your rights in Florida’s pure comparative fault system is a first step to recovery. Having the right legal team by your side makes a huge difference. Contact an experienced attorney in Tampa at Bonardi & Uzdavinis LLP if you have questions about comparative negligence. We are here to protect your future and help you make informed choices.Feel Free To Schedule A Consultation
Contact Bonardi & Uzdavinis without delay to arrange a FREE consultation.
